Why do so many people have doubts regarding the Adam and Eve Story in the Bible?

People seem to have no problem in accepting the possibility of alien life and yet they balk at accepting the existence of a spirit realm where invisible spirit persons inhabit that are not dependent on the existence of matter.  The scientific evidence that leads to the conclusion that matter was created gives credence to the idea that there are spirit persons that do not depend on matter for their existence

In my experience the situation has come about because of two reasons. One reason is the widespread belief in the theory of evolution as an alternative explanation for creation. The second reason is the prevailing ignorance of the Bible and its history. This ignorance is largely due to the failure of the religious clergy, who have basically abandoned their flocks to atheism and the evolution theory.

These clergymen  themselves have doubts regarding the Bible’s authenticity. I personally had an experience during the 1950′s that well illustrates this point. I was discussing the Bible with the Governor General of South Africa at that time. He told me that he was very good friends with the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Archbishop had told him that one should study the Bible like one eats fish. One must spit out the bones. I was shocked, because the Archbishop of Canterbury was the head of the church of England.  Imagine, if the head of a church had that attitude then what chance did the members of that church have of ever learning the truth about the Bible.

The Clergy and Evolution

A further investigation of the subject indicates that many of the clergymen of those early days of the 20th century started out as God-fearing Bible believers, but they were exposed to a form of scholarship at their respective seminaries known as the “Higher Criticism.” The proponents of this school of biblical criticism, because of their belief in the evolution theory, believed that religion simply evolved from what they called animism, (the primitive worship of the forces of nature) then to polytheism (the worship of many Gods) and then to monotheism (the highest form of worship, the worship of one God). These evolutionists assumed that the Bible is merely man’s attempt to record his religious history. Although religious teachers, the question of divine inspiration did not enter their equation. They accepted the evolution theory as fact and because of the anti-Bible bias in their teaching, destroyed the faith of their students. Thus many sincere men that at one time had faith in the Bible, had their faith destroyed at these seminaries.  After all one is supposed to believe what the teacher teaches. As all this occurred during the early part of the 20th century, today many of those men, now clergymen are of little use in building faith in the Bible. They are being looked up to, as representing Christianity, God and the Bible, but  do not whole-heartedly believe in the Bible preferring to believe that man’s religion today is just part of his evolutionary development. Thus the Adam and Eve Story becomes a quaint mythological story, and the Bible merely a reflection of what men in ancient times believed.  That is why these men  meddle in politics,  looking for materialist solutions to human problems. They further introduced confusion into the equation because of merely using selected scripture texts to support their own traditional church teachings instead of allowing the Bible to explain itself.

Science and Creation

As I have stated in some of my other articles on this site the first question that should be considered in regard to a religious discussion is the question of whether one believes in God or not. The answer is fundamentally very simple to answer. That the universe and ourselves exist is not open to question, but the question is were they always here or did they have a beginning.

The view that modern science has with regard to the universe is that it is expanding. It is almost as if the universe exploded into existence and we are now somewhere in the middle of this explosion with regard to time. Imagine if the explosion were recorded on film and we reversed the film it would ultimately come to a point where matter came into existence and exploded. This is fundamentally as far back as science can go. This is what the evidence points to. Any theory proposed by evolutionists as an alternative means nothing, as it contravenes an elementary principle of logic. Nothing cannot produce anything. Another strong proof of creation lies in the fact that we can still see stars in the sky. How so? The stars are gigantic furnaces generating heat by converting matter into heat energy. Now if the universe was always here, and therefore the quantity of matter fixed in the universe, then the stars would have converted all the matter in the universe into energy and the universe would be dead in the process. Sir Isaac Newton is credited with making this observation. To understand what he was driving at consider these  illustrations.

When a steam train travels along, the fireman puts coal into the furnace. If he never ever stopped to fill the tender with more coal, eventually all the coal would be burned up and the train would come to a stop. Also, someone would have to provide the coal to fill the tender. If the tender ran out of coal the train would stop.

If one painted a balloon and blew it up, it would expand like our expanding universe. As this expansion increased the particles of paint would move further and further away from one another. If the process of blowing up the balloon continued indefinitely all the particles of paint would ultimately move out of sight of each other. In the same way as the universe expanded the stars would gradually move further and further away from each other. if the expansion of the universe was infinite all the stars in the heavens would have ultimately moved out of sight of each other and our sky would be empty of stars.  This is scientific evidence that the universe had to have had a beginning and because nothing cannot create anything our universe had to have had a creator.

However evolutionist are still trying to find alternative theories to counter the scientific evidence. The most recent alternative theory was “the oscillating universe theory”. This theory proposes that gravity is slowing down the expansion so it will ultimately stop expanding and because of gravity begin to collapse on itself. In this way they thought to evade the question of creation by assuming that this expansion and contraction could carry on forever. However this theory has been disproved by more recent evidence that the expansion of the universe is speeding up and not slowing down as the theory requires. And in any case in view of Isaac Newton’s observation regarding the fact that the stars were furnaces and using fuel, even an oscillating universe would still have required a creator.

Now once you have a creator you cannot put limitations on his creative powers. The wisdom, power and creative ability to create a universe is so great that our creator could not be human or suffer from human limitations. Our Creator must lay outside creation and because matter only came into existence at creation, he must exist in a form higher than matter. That is why we refer to God as a spirit being. Questions like “who created God” are  irrelevant because logic shows that nothing can arise from nothing and so the  original cause of creation had always to be there, That question is only asked to create doubt in God’s  existence, and so once we have established that the creation had a beginning, and that God’s existence is established, the question becomes irrelevant. When one considers the matter, who are we to say what the creator can or cannot do. It would be the height of presumption to imagine that we could say that God cannot do this or that. Once our science has led us to the existence of a creator, with the power at his proposal the universe could have been created having the appearance of being very old. This simply means that creation could have occurred at any time with the appearance of age and thereafter genuinely aged and this factor is not taken into account when estimating the age of the universe.

Adam and Eve & Population Increase

With regard to the Adam and Eve story, one has only to consider the rate of population growth to see that this not only supports the idea of one perfect human pair at the beginning but it also becomes a problem for the evolutionist.

If we consider the time available for population growth, Bible time allows for a little over 6000 years whereas the evolution time scale allows for millions of years. Which do you think is the most reasonable in the light of facts?

In 1975 according to the Bible’s count of time approximately, six thousand years have passed counting from man’s creation.

At present in 2008 the world population is just under seven billion.

In 1975 the population was about three and a half billion.

The population reached about one billion by 1830 C.E. .

Now if the population rose from one billion to minus seven billion in a little over 170 years,  and yet, the first billion was only reached after 5830 years (in bible time) then the rate of growth was very slow at the beginning and is escalating today. Bear in mind that this growth rate was in spite of the occurrence of wars and epidemics, which might have slowed the growth somewhat. Still with all these factors considered the growth rate is still 5830 years to reach 1,000,000,000.  This indicates that 5830 years is still a very long time to reach 1,000,000,000 compared to the latest increases.

How does this fit in with evolutionary reasoning?  It has been scientifically ascertained from archaeology that humans have been capable of writing and producing a civilization in the region of  6000 years. This indicates  that according to the evolution theory man has evolved very little during the past 6000 years. With  mankind evolving so slowly it becomes apparent that the first true men could have arrived many thousands or perhaps a million years earlier. Which period of time is the most reasonable to arrive at for the first billion? The 5830 years, which already appears to be a very slow population increase, or the many more thousands or even millions of years provided by the evolution theory.? Also remember that evolution claims that man’s speech arose from grunts and growls and gradually evolved into more complex languages. The presence of the many ancient complex languages like ancient Hebrew and others also indicates that according to evolution theory, intelligent humans should have developed much simpler languages a long time earlier and therefore the evidence is clear that if evolution was true then the population growth would have been so great that we would probably have populated the entire solar system by now.

Genetic Damage

It has been discovered that the human race in general is experiencing genetic damage. Apparently we are being bombarded by cosmic rays and other forms of radiation. As these rays pass through our bodies, they occasionally collide with  genes. If they collide with genes in our sex cells then the damage is passed on to succeeding generations. This is one of the reasons why intermarriage with close relatives is dangerous. If both parties in such a marriage both have the same damaged genes the problem is intensified. This means that contrary to the theory of evolution which maintains that the human race is evolving upwards, science  has actually established that the human race is deteriorating. This is one of the reasons that the Bible shows that humans lived to far greater ages prior to the global flood of Noah’s day. According to the Bible humans have been exposed to this deteriorating effect for about 6000 years. However according to evolution theory humans have been around for a much longer time. Even if one conservatively estimates  that man has been around for about 60.000 years instead of a millions years, can you imagine how much worse this deterioration would have been compared to the Bible’s 6000 years. Surely the present physical state that humans find themselves in favors mankind being 6000, years rather than the longer time periods demanded by the evolution theory.

The present population therefore favors the biblical count of time which would make it reasonable for the Adam and Eve story to be the more logical beginning for population growth. Obviously one has to have two matched humans, male and female to start population growth. Recently an evolutionist proposed that the presence of male and female is not necessary because some creatures can reproduce alone. My argument is that some creatures can lose a tail or a limb and can immediately grow a replacement but they are not humans.

Adam and Eve and DNA

What would be the chances of a blind mindless force like natural selection evolving two humans completely different in emotional and physical makeup and yet matched genetically so well as to be able to reproduce? Humans cannot reproduce with apes. The genetic code in the DNA does not allow it, The genetic match must be perfect. That is why the Bible’s statement in Genesis is a scientific fact. Creatures only produce after their kind. Dogs only reproduce with dogs. Humans can only reproduce with humans. That is why it is logical to understand that the genetic factors in humans show that we are all related to one another no matter what racial characteristics are in evidence. Evolutionists only theorize that the “kind barrier” can be overcome, however it has never ever been observed to actually occur. Any attempt to bridge the “kind barrier” results in sterility. Therefore we may ask which is the more scientific explanation, the Bible’s observation regarding the reproduction being limited to “kinds” or the evolution theory of unlimited reproduction that is necessary for evolution to be true? Which of these two explanations fits the actual facts. I would venture that the Bible is more scientific. In fact the evolutionist version is purely religious, being an article of faith and evolutionists are still searching for proof whereas the Bible provides statements of scientific truth,

By going back into the past we logically come to a time when the human race came from a single human pair. However some persons question how all human kind with all the  different races could have originated from one human pair, but this is perfectly in harmony with science. The racial characteristics are merely caused by the fact, that as people moved to different areas of the earth their gene pool shrank and certain characteristics were emphasized.

What was Adam?

Genesis records that God created Adam from the earth. The problem with the religious teaching regarding this is the definition of man that the religions have ascribed to man.  Nearly all professed Christian religions teach that man is composed of an immortal soul that cannot die and a fleshly body that is subject to death. However this is not a Bible teaching. Genesis 2:7 says that the man “became a soul” and not that a soul was put into him. Logically if a person becomes a doctor then he is a doctor and so if a man becomes a soul then he is a soul. By examining an Analytical Concordance like Young’s we find that the word immortal only appears in the Bible four times and is never used with regard to the Hebrew and Greek words for soul.

By contrast when God judged Adam for his sin God explained what Adam was. He said “for dust you are and to dust you will return.” (Gen. 3:19). The Bible hope for the future of man is a resurrection or recreation of the individual rather than survival of an immortal soul. Such an achievement would be child’s play for the God who created this universe. Furthermore, the findings of medical science agree with the Bible’s definition of man. Scientists have never found any entity that survives the body. Religions regard the soul as the real you, capable of thought and capable of influencing the living. However the thinking ability does not exist apart from the body and this is shown by the fact that if persons suffer brain damage it affects their thinking ability.

Were Adam and Eve real people? Evidently, the writer of Luke’s Gospel believed that Adam was real because when tracing Jesus ancestry at Luke Chapter 3 he tracers it right back to Adam (Luke 3:38 ) the son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.

The Jews at  that time recorded  very accurate records of their ancestry in their temple archives because their priests were selected from the tribe of Levi and the royal line was traced through Judah and David. Therefore when we read that Luke traced all things with accuracy (Luke 1:1-3) we can be certain that he was able to consult those records.  As it was important for Jesus to have come from the line of David, both Mary and Joseph, his parents had to fulfill this requirement.  Any Jew at any time in their history could check  the  manuscripts with the records at the temple and so confirm that the  genealogies were correct. This also provides circumstantial evidence of the Bible’s truthfulness and accuracy. Furthermore any Jew living at the time when Jesus was on earth would have been able to check the ancestry of Jesus for himself.  As the three and a half years of Jesus’ ministry, and the first three and a half years of the apostle’s ministry after Pentecost was only to the Jews, we can be sure that the vast increase of Jewish converts  confirm that the genealogy of Jesus was correct. It was only after the year 70 CE with the destruction of their  temple and their genealogical records, that Jews are now unable to trace their ancestry.

Once we deny Adam’s existence then we might ask who was Seth’s father? At what point in the Jew’s genealogical records did myth become reality? Furthermore Jesus himself obviously believed that Adam and Eve were real people because in his discussion on divorce he used their reality  as a factual example. (Mark 10:6-12) . . .However, from [the] beginning of creation ‘He made them male and female. 7 On this account a man will leave his father and mother, 8 and the two will be one flesh’; so that they are no longer two, but one flesh. 9 Therefore what God yoked together let no man put apart.” 10 When again in the house the disciples began to question him concerning this. 11 And he said to them: “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her, 12 and if ever a woman, after divorcing her husband, marries another, she commits adultery.”

I seriously question a person’s claim to being a Christian, if he doubts that Adam and Eve were real people, because the founder of Christianity accepted it and could trace his lineage back to Adam. Furthermore the whole teaching regarding why Jesus Christ had to die to redeem mankind is based on the fact that Adam was the progenitor of the human race. Anyone that believes that Adam was not an actual person and considers himself to be a Christian is cutting the ground from under his feet.  As many clergymen accept that the Adam and Eve story is allegorical, they do not appear to realize that they are denying the ransom of Christ by their belief and teaching. According to the Bible anyone that adopts that position is not covered by the ransom of Jesus and remains dead in their sins.
(Hebrews 10:26-31) . . .For if we practice sin willfully after having received the accurate knowledge of the truth, there is no longer any sacrifice for sins left, 27 but [there is] a certain fearful expectation of judgment ————-29 Of how much more severe a punishment, do YOU think, will the man be counted worthy who has trampled upon the Son of God and who has esteemed as of ordinary value the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and who has outraged the spirit of undeserved kindness with contempt? 30 For we know him that said: “Vengeance is mine; I will recompense”; and again: “Jehovah will judge his people.” 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of [the] living God.

Were Adam and Eve Married?

With regard to the question of whether Adam and Eve parented the whole human race, the scripture tells us at Gen 3:20 that Adam called his wife’s name Eve because she was to “become the mother of all living“. Furthermore Jesus himself said “Therefore what God yoked together let no man put apart.””

Gen, 2:22-24 and Gen. 3:19 also answer the question of who married Adam and Eve.  When God created the woman, Gen, 2;22-24 says that God brought the woman to the man. Then it says that man showed his joy by composing a poem in which he showed that he understood that the woman was of his flesh and bone and named her woman which means a man with a womb. He also referred to her as his wife and at Gen 3:19 said that he called his wife’s name Eve. This means that God’s bringing the woman to the man constituted the marriage ceremony at that time.

How about the genetic dangers involved in incestuous marriages? Would this have prevented the first humans from marrying their own relatives? No! Not as much as today.  From a scientific perspective this is also scientifically correct. Science has discovered that the genes in the DNA get damaged periodically  by cosmic rays and other radiation collisions. When this damage occurs within the reproductive cells this damage is passed on to generation after generation. This has resulted in the deterioration of the genetic code causing individuals to have a predisposition  to certain diseases. Logically if we go back in time we find less and less damage done to the DNA until we should arrive at a time when the first humans had very little or no damage to their DNA.  At this stage there would have been very little danger for humans to marry close relatives.

More about Marrying Relatives

Some persons are under the impression that Adam and Eve had only two sons Cain and Abel, and so the question arises as to who they married.  However once again this demonstrates the failure of the religious clergy who have not taught their flocks the truth. Gen. 4:25 says that Eve also bore Seth. At Genesis 6:3,4 the Bible states that Adam had “sons and daughters“ and that Seth was born when Adam was 130 years old. Adam is further reported as living to  930 years old. Some have problems with the vast ages that the Bible supplies, but again it is scientifically perfectly reasonable. If our genes have been damaged physically so that today we are mere shadows of what we used to be it is quite reasonable to comprehend that the damaged genes are also responsible for the short lengths of our lives. In fact there are experiments being conducted today because some scientists think that they have discovered which genes control the lifespans of an individual. Of course there are also other factors which bear on this.

At Leviticus 18:7-18 God showed that with the introduction of his law to the nation of Israel through Moses, close relatives were forbidden to marry each other. So God provided the first basic safeguard against genetic degeneration. Remember that the microscope had not been invented nor was there any scientific knowledge of genetics at that time yet God gave the Israelites a law that protected them from genetic degeneration. In this way the Israelites were protected from an increase of inherited diseases. Another example of Divine guidance as the Israelites had no  way of knowing this fact without God’s help.

Adam’s Rib

Why did God fashion the woman from one of Adam’s ribs? Some people think that this is unreasonable but consider this fact. Science has discovered that every single cell in the body contains the DNA code. This is one of the reasons why scientists have been able to clone animals from a single cell, making the clone an exact duplicate of the original. Now if under the right conditions a cell can be encouraged to grow and become a duplicate of the original creature what is so hard about God taking a rib, which contains cells with Adam’s DNA and moulding them into a duplicate of Adam but making a slight adjustment in the DNA to produce a  female version. It is only a slight adjustment in the DNA that decides whether a person is male or female.

You may have watched documentary films that show a flower visibly growing out of the soil. This is achieved by taking single photographs of the flower’s growth spaced in time. When the film is  projected one sees the entire process happening in a minute or two.  Now I am not saying that this is what occurred at creation but it helps us to see the plausibility of the process. If one has the power to create a universe, fashioning a rib into a woman would be child’s play. Now just imagine that God using the DNA in Adam’s rib caused it to grow like that flower into a woman and speeded up the growth process so that it appeared to happen just like the growth of the flower in our illustration. Would this make it easier to comprehend. However this is only an illustration. God does not need this.

One of the reasons why peopls find it hard to believe, is that many atheistic scientists find it hard to accept miracles and so are always looking for some natural cause to explain a miracle. However what natural cause can one find to explain the creation of the universe. The fact that the universe had a beginning proves beyond a doubt that it was created. Atheists are looking for evidences of life on other planets, for which their is no proof of their existence and yet they find it hard to believe in the existence of another form of life which is not depended on matter. Yet surely the evidence of creation proves the existence of such life. So the existence of God is a proven scientific fact based on an understanding of the law of cause and effect.

Having the woman made out of the man’s body was important to God’s purpose.  It meant that all other humans basically came from Adam. God made Eve from Adam’s rib and the rest of the human race came from Adam and Eve’s body through the normal process of procreation. That is why God could use his son, Jesus  to die as a ransom for mankind. If Adam and Eve were both separate creations then it would have required the sacrifice of two perfect humans to ransom mankind. I suggest that you read the article “the Miracle of the Ransom” which will explain how this arrangement worked. That is why if a person does not believe in the reality of Adam and Eve, he will never understand why Christ had to die to redeem us, and why God could not forgive us without permitting his son to die for us. This is all explained in my article entitled “the Miracle of the Ransom.”

(1 Timothy 2:14)  Also, Adam was not deceived, but the woman was thoroughly deceived and came to be in transgression. . .

God held Adam responsible for the problem. If Adam had refused to follow Eve in her foolishness, the human race would not have been affected. We are affected because Adam was the progenitor of all humans and including his own wife.

So the act of forming the woman from Adam’s rib also fulfilled two other functions. The first was that Adams and Eve’s DNA were basically the same. Secondly, God introduced the principle of headship to man. Many women have been conditioned to believe that the principle of headship is demeaning to women but this is not true. Men are instructed in the bible to handle their headship over women just as Jesus Christ handled his headship over the Christian congregation.

(Ephesians 5:21-25) . . .Be in subjection to one another in fear of Christ. 22 Let wives be in subjection to their husbands as to the Lord, 23 because a husband is head of his wife as the Christ also is head of the congregation, he being a savior of [this] body. 24 In fact, as the congregation is in subjection to the Christ, so let wives also be to their husbands in everything. 25 Husbands, continue loving YOUR wives, just as the Christ also loved the congregation and delivered up himself for it,

(1 Corinthians 11:3) . . .But I want YOU to know that the head of every man is the Christ; in turn the head of a woman is the man; in turn the head of the Christ is God.

(Ephesians 5:28-29) . . .In this way husbands ought to be loving their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself, 29 for no man ever hated his own flesh; but he feeds and cherishes it, as the Christ also does the congregation. . .

This precludes any harsh and abusive treatment by faithful men of their wives. Christ also set the example by subjecting himself to the headship of this father, Jehovah God. It also means that the man is accountable to Jesus Christ for the way he handles his headship in his marriage.

The Bible indicates that although God held Adam accountable for his wrongdoing, it was Eve’s failure to recognize the authority that Adam possessed as her head that started off the whole process of wrongdoing.

Although allowed plenty of room for personal decision-making as shown by the Proverbs 31, important decisions affecting the whole family had to be discussed with her husband who had the responsibility to make the final decision.

(Proverbs 31:10) . . .A capable wife who can find? Her value is far more than that of corals.

(Proverbs 31:16) . . .She has considered a field and proceeded to obtain it; from the fruitage of her hands she has planted a vineyard.

(Proverbs 31:18) . . .She has sensed that her trading is good; her lamp does not go out at night.

(Proverbs 31:23) . . .Her owner is someone known in the gates, when he sits down with the older men of the land.

(Proverbs 31:24) . . .She has made even undergarments and proceeded to sell [them], and belts she has given to the tradesmen.

(Proverbs 31:26) . . .Her mouth she has opened in wisdom, and the law of loving-kindness is upon her tongue.

(Proverbs 31:27) . . .She is watching over the goings-on of her household, and the bread of laziness she does not eat.

(Proverbs 31:28) . . .Her sons have risen up and proceeded to pronounce her happy; her owner [rises up], and he praises her.

(Proverbs 31:30) . . .Charm may be false, and prettiness may be vain; [but] the woman that fears Jehovah is the one that procures praise for herself. . .

(Proverbs 31:31) . . .GIVE her of the fruitage of her hands, and let her works praise her even in the gates.

Eve should have consulted her husband regarding such an important matter which would affect the destiny of both her husband and herself. Adam was created first, then the woman came to be out of the man and was formed to be his helper, or helpmate.

(1 Timothy 2:12-14) . . .I do not permit a woman to teach, or to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 Also, Adam was not deceived, but the woman was thoroughly deceived and came to be in transgression.

Adams conduct could therefore affect all the members of the human race, which it did. If Adam had remained faithful he could have passed on perfection to his offspring. God withdrew his protection from Adam and so he began to succumb to the 2nd law of thermodynamics As he was now dying albeit being a slow process, we could only inherit the same dying process in our bodies. As he sinned before any of his children were born we all inherited imperfection and death from him. By Adam sinning he squandered our life rights and condemned us to this sorry condition that has been aggravated by thousands of years of falling away from perfection.  If God in his mercy wanted to legally return those lost rights to us, so that we could have the same opportunity to live forever, Justice demanded a price of equal value to Adam. This was the ransom provision. How could God  provide such a price without creating a new man and so conceding that the human race was a failure.? God accomplished this by selecting a faithful spirit son who was willing to perform this service for his father by coming to earth and providing the sacrificial offering. To accomplish this the son would have to be human. God performed a miracle by transferring the son’s life pattern into the womb of a faithful Jewish virgin. As a perfect human son, as a human son of God, Jesus now possessed the same rights that Adam had had when perfect. This included the right to have a perfect human family. His death as a faithful son balanced the scales of justice. After being resurrected to where he had been before ,  he still possessed the right to a perfect human family. The ransom provided Adam’s children with the opportunity to be judged in perfection.

Once one accepts that God exists and has created the universe, it should be a simple matter to understand that before God created the universe he had already created other creatures in the same form as himself which is spirit. As the details concerning the rebellion that broke out in the universe have been discussed in other articles on this site, I will not go into details.  Apparently one of these spirit creatures developed a bad spirit (attitude), rebelled and tried to use Adam and Eve’s creation to challenge God’s authority. God’s way of handling the matter was to give the rebel a full opportunity to prove his case. His failure would then prove God true and vindicate God’s universal sovereignty. Unfortunately we humans have been made the center of the issue by this rebel whom God labeled Satan, which means “Adversary” or “Opposer”.

Without the Bible we would never have understood why mankind suffers today, however God fully intends rectifying the matter once certain issues have been settled. Unfortunately Satan has introduced false ideas to get humans to disobey God  just as he did to Adam and Eve.. It is necessary for us all to get accurate knowledge so as to combat these deceptions. I strongly suggest that one reads the two articles on my site entitled “The Origin of Religion” and “the Scientific Accuracy of Genesis” which are a logical followup to this subject.  If you wish to contact me, i can be contacted by e-mail at info@facethefacts.co.za.

One can also consult the links provided for further research.

If you wish to see a list of articles select this link.

Posted in Categories :- Religion, Science, all